Pride and Prejudice: Beautiful Book Cover Designs

Scrolling through Pinterest, as I love to do, I came across a beautiful cover for Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. It got me thinking about just how many different interpretations there must have been over the years, so I went looking for some of my favourites.

I only have one copy at home, although I have two copies of Emma, my namesake, and I would happily own more. I love book design. A beautiful cover can turn a book into a little work of art in its own right.

I tend to prefer the more illustrative covers, particularly those that use pattern, print or typography. Photographic or very literal illustrations can steal some of the opportunity to imagine the characters for myself. I like a cover to suggest a world without defining it completely.

Jane Austen first drafted the novel in 1796, when she was 20, under the title First Impressions. She returned to it years later, revising it extensively from 1811 to 1812 before Pride and Prejudice was published in January 1813. More than two centuries later, designers are still finding completely new ways to introduce us to Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy.

The Peacock Edition

It seems only right to begin with perhaps the most famous of them all.

1894 Peacock Edition of Pride and Prejudice illustrated by Hugh Thomson
The celebrated 1894 ‘Peacock Edition’, published by George Allen and illustrated by Hugh Thomson.

The green cloth and extraordinary gilt peacock-feather design make this feel precious before you have even opened it. It was also the first edition of Pride and Prejudice to be fully illustrated throughout, with Thomson creating 160 illustrations for the book.

Black and white version of Hugh Thomson's peacock design for Pride and Prejudice
Hugh Thomson's peacock design stripped back to line work.

I love seeing the same design without the gilt. It makes you appreciate just how intricate Thomson's drawing actually is: all those feathers, flourishes and little changes of line.

A classic constantly reinvented

1946 Laidlaw Brothers school edition of Pride and Prejudice
A 1946 school edition from Laidlaw Brothers, incorporating imagery from the 1940 film adaptation.

This is far more literal than the covers I normally gravitate towards, but I love it as a piece of publishing history. The simple blue-grey design and tiny dancing couple feel unmistakably of their period.

2000 Modern Library Pride and Prejudice cover designed by Gabrielle Bordwin
Modern Library Classics, 2000. Cover design by Gabrielle Bordwin, using artwork and illustrations by Hugh Thomson.

I particularly like this one now I know the connection. More than a century after the Peacock Edition, Hugh Thomson's illustrations are being reworked into a completely different visual language. The red dress, wallpaper-like pattern and quiet writing figure feel modern, but there is still a thread leading all the way back to 1894.

2002 Penguin Classics edition of Pride and Prejudice
Penguin Classics, 2002, using a detail from Sir Thomas Lawrence's Double Portrait of the Fullerton Sisters.

Perhaps this is the exception to my rule about more realistic imagery. The painting is beautiful, and I can't help loving those dresses. The black lower half also makes it feel unmistakably Penguin.

Green and pink Signet Classics Pride and Prejudice anniversary cover
Signet Classics' brilliantly bright 200th Anniversary Edition.

This one couldn't be much further from the traditional portrait-and-country-house treatment. Green, pink, hand-lettering and a tiny birdcage. It is playful and completely confident in its colour.

Pattern, lettering and the book as an object

2011 Barnes and Noble Pride and Prejudice cover by Jessica Hische
Barnes & Noble, 2011. Cover artwork by Jessica Hische.

This is probably closest to what I love in book design: typography becoming illustration. The lettering is allowed to dominate, with the delicate flourishes and metallic detail turning the whole cover into something decorative.

2013 Folio Society edition of Pride and Prejudice illustrated by Anna and Elena Balbusso
The Folio Society edition from 2013, illustrated by Anna and Elena Balbusso and bound in blocked metallic cloth.

I love the restraint of this one. The profile is simple, while those wandering lines seem almost like handwriting, conversation or thoughts escaping across the cover. It feels both contemporary and very tactile.

Celebrating Pride and Prejudice by Susannah Fullerton cover designed by Connie Gabbert
A slight detour: Susannah Fullerton's Celebrating Pride and Prejudice, published in 2013, with cover design by Connie Gabbert.

This isn't an edition of Austen's novel at all, but a book about it, and I still wanted to include it. The peacocks bring us straight back to Hugh Thomson, but the turquoise, cream and fine line work make the idea feel fresh again. Two hundred years on, even the visual history of Pride and Prejudice had become something worth celebrating.

Pride and Prejudice edition with painterly cover design by Leanne Shapton
One of Anthropologie's Jane Austen editions, featuring Leanne Shapton's painterly cover artwork.

This is exactly the sort of cover I am drawn to: essentially pattern, colour and hand-drawn type. It doesn't tell us what Elizabeth looks like or what Darcy looks like; it simply gives the book a personality of its own.

2016 Arcturus edition of Pride and Prejudice with magenta silhouette cover
A strikingly contemporary Arcturus Classics edition from 2016.

And then there is this. Deep magenta, almost fluorescent orange and a flat silhouette. It feels more like a poster than a traditional classic-novel cover. I love that a book written at the end of the eighteenth century can carry something this bold without feeling remotely wrong.

Perhaps that is what I enjoy most about looking at all these editions. The words remain the same, but every generation gets another chance to decide what Pride and Prejudice should look like.

Some designers give us portraits and period detail, others peacocks, pattern, colour, lettering or just a silhouette. None of them can be definitive, and that is rather the joy of it. Elizabeth and Darcy still belong to the reader.

Comments